Praxifi

Whitepaper V1.3 Public Release

Praxifi documentation

A practical documentation system for Praxifi - Non-Custodial Financial Policy Infrastructure for Digital Wealth. It translates the approved Whitepaper V1.3 into current product behavior, boundaries, evidence, security, legal limitations, and user-facing operating guidance.

Product scope

Overview

Praxifi is a non-custodial financial policy infrastructure for digital wealth. The current public application supports MetaMask authentication, protected dashboard access, selected Base Mainnet portfolio visibility, HS-V1 diagnostics, policy configuration and review, and status/history views.

  • Product status: live web application with operational application-level functionality.
  • Current public policy path: Base Mainnet, chain ID 8453.
  • Version 1 focuses on owner-authorized policies, not investment management or legal inheritance determination.
  • Base Mainnet contract deployment is internally documented; independent audit evidence and sustained real-funds operation are not claimed.
Application availability, contract deployment, and verified Production operation are separate evidence states.

First use

Getting Started

Users connect MetaMask, sign a scoped authentication message, review Base Mainnet configuration, inspect supported assets, and create policies only after reviewing authorization requirements.

  • Supported wallet path: MetaMask wallet connection.
  • Authentication: backend nonce, wallet signature, server-side verification, and protected session.
  • Wallet login does not authorize asset movement.
  • Users should confirm Base Mainnet, wallet address, supported token balance, recipient, amount, and allowance before activation.
  • Cancelling a policy depends on policy type, current state, and available cancellation controls.

Visibility boundaries

Portfolio

Portfolio visibility is limited to Base assets currently supported by Praxifi. Portfolio visibility is not the same as automation eligibility.

  • Current visibility may include Base native ETH and selected registered Base ERC-20 assets.
  • Examples currently include USDC, USDT, and WETH where registered and readable.
  • Complete arbitrary ERC-20 enumeration is not claimed.
  • Automation eligibility is limited to USDC and USDT.
  • WETH may appear in diagnostics but remains blocked from current automation execution.
Portfolio assets shown are limited to Base assets currently supported by Praxifi. Some ERC-20 holdings may not appear yet.

HS-V1 methodology

Portfolio Healthiness

Portfolio Healthiness is experimental, heuristic, deterministic, versioned, diagnostic, non-predictive, non-advisory, not a suitability assessment, not a credit rating, and independently unvalidated.

  • HS-V1 uses ten weighted categories totaling 10.00.
  • Normalized score = 10 x weighted assessed contribution / assessable weight.
  • Minimum assessable weight is provisionally 6.0, but it is heuristic and not a scientific boundary between good and bad portfolios.
  • Missing evidence must not automatically become a risk score.
  • Confidence reflects coverage, freshness, provider consistency, asset identification, historical availability, and security-data availability.
  • Confidence is not a probability that the score is correct.

Owner-authorized rules

Policies

A financial policy is a narrow, owner-authorized instruction with defined parameters, lifecycle state, cancellation boundaries, eligibility checks, execution evidence, and fees only after a defined successful billable execution.

  • Policy parameters include owner, network, token, amount, recipient, condition, timing, and cancellation rights where supported.
  • Authorization requires wallet ownership and supported token approval where applicable.
  • Lifecycle states separate draft, active, cancelled, pending execution, submitted, confirmed, failed, and refundable states where implemented.
  • Execution must match the original authorized policy parameters.

Time-based policy

Scheduled Transfer

Scheduled Transfer lets an owner configure a supported stablecoin transfer for a selected future execution time, subject to approval, eligibility, cancellation, and execution evidence.

  • Current automation-eligible assets: USDC and USDT.
  • The user reviews token, amount, recipient, and execution time before activation.
  • Failure conditions include missing approval, insufficient balance, unsupported token, cancellation, RPC failure, finality delay, or configuration mismatch.
  • Fee: 0.5%, capped at USD 3, after defined successful billable execution.

Inactivity policy

Basic Inheritance

Basic Inheritance is an inactivity-triggered technical continuity policy. It does not prove death, incapacity, identity, lawful heirs, or legal entitlement.

  • The owner selects a designated recipient and inactivity condition.
  • Activity confirmation can renew or cancel the inactivity path where supported.
  • A designated recipient is not automatically a legal beneficiary.
  • Fee: 0.75%, capped at USD 25, after defined successful billable execution.

Refundable continuity

Refundable Inheritance

Refundable Inheritance adds an acceptance, refund, waiver, release, expiry, and shutdown lifecycle around a contract-controlled escrow-like state. It is implemented and internally tested, but requires separate legal and operational qualification.

  • The beneficiary acceptance flow must be validated before the refundable lifecycle progresses.
  • Owner refund returns control through the approved lifecycle path where conditions permit.
  • Beneficiary claim and owner refund paths are separate state transitions.
  • Fee: 1.0%, capped at USD 49, after defined successful billable execution.

Continuity signal

Activity Confirmation

Activity Confirmation is a Product signal used to show that the wallet owner is still active. It is not death proof, incapacity proof, identity proof, or a legal beneficiary determination.

  • Current behavior relies on wallet authority and application-level confirmation.
  • Password-assisted check-in may help user experience but does not recover keys.
  • Replay protection, scoped messages, and chain/domain consistency remain security requirements.
  • Gasless check-in remains a research boundary unless separately verified.

System components

Architecture

Praxifi separates user wallet authority, frontend review, backend coordination, smart-contract constraints, technical executor submission, Worker/Poller operations, data providers, RPC providers, notifications, audit records, and reconciliation.

  • The user wallet remains the source of ownership and approval authority.
  • The frontend explains and collects policy parameters; it must not hardcode contract addresses outside shared registries.
  • Backend services coordinate sessions, policy records, observability, and eligibility.
  • Smart contracts constrain execution to authorized parameters.
  • Worker and Poller services remain operational infrastructure with PARTIAL maturity.

Base Mainnet deployment

Smart Contracts

Current project records identify Base Mainnet deployments for the Version 1 policy contracts. Deployment is not an independent audit and does not alone establish sustained Production operation.

  • PraxifiInactivityExecutorV2: 0x29c6efF6D4f2687568e77E6CAA34102C92b07552
  • PraxifiRefundEscrow: 0x4A0f710cEE41E1987E0f5B6601Bf1Fd229d78b82
  • PraxifiScheduledTransfer: 0x35874Fd2bF16d0C7D2430BcBAae5D10547F83A56
  • Network: Base Mainnet, chain ID 8453.
  • Polygon policy deployment is not established in this release.
  • Independent smart-contract audit is not claimed.

Worker / Poller status: PARTIAL

Execution and Operations

Worker / Poller: PARTIAL

Execution operations include candidate selection, eligibility checks, transaction submission, idempotency, finality, retry, reconciliation, history, notifications, incident handling, gas monitoring, and executor balance monitoring.

  • Worker/Poller maturity remains PARTIAL.
  • Sustained Production operation, failover, SLOs, and real-funds runtime are not independently verified.
  • Failed or skipped attempts should not create a Praxifi service fee.
  • Execution history distinguishes submitted, provisional, finalized, failed, and cancelled evidence where supported.

Boundaries and safeguards

Security

Security is based on least privilege, owner-authorized material parameters, cancellation and renewal where available, single execution, idempotency, evidence, and explicit acknowledgement that non-custodial design does not remove risk.

  • Praxifi does not receive private keys or general wallet authority.
  • Approvals should be understandable and limited to supported policy requirements.
  • Audit, security events, execution proofs, and monitoring are observability layers, not guarantees.
  • Security-related reports: praxifi.official@gmail.com

Risks are documented, not eliminated

Threat Model

The public threat model groups risks across user wallets, execution infrastructure, smart contracts, token behavior, pricing/data providers, and operations.

  • User / Wallet: wallet compromise, wallet loss, recipient-address error, malicious frontend, session hijacking, password compromise, signature replay, chain/domain mismatch.
  • Execution: executor-key compromise, executor censorship, executor downtime, Worker failure, Poller failure, RPC failure, RPC inconsistency, chain reorganization, insufficient finality, gas shortage, duplicate execution.
  • Smart Contract: contract vulnerabilities, approval misuse, unlimited allowances, timestamp assumptions, upgrade authority, pause authority.
  • Token / Stablecoin: issuer freeze, blacklist, pause, depeg, token incompatibility, decimals, rounding, fee-on-transfer, rebasing, non-standard behavior.
  • Pricing / Data: oracle manipulation, stale pricing, provider poisoning, incomplete portfolio data.
  • Operations: notification failure, service shutdown, dependency compromise, privacy leakage, treasury compromise, gas-price spike.

Execution-fee model

Fees and Economics

Praxifi uses an execution-fee model for supported policies. There is no subscription, native Praxifi token, or separate payment gateway required for the current model.

  • Gross amount = net recipient amount + service fee.
  • Fee is intended to settle from transferred principal.
  • Fee applies only after the defined successful billable execution.
  • Gas and external costs remain separate.
  • Pricing, depeg, and oracle Production specifications remain qualified.

Base Mainnet current path

Supported Networks and Assets

The current public network is Base Mainnet, chain ID 8453. Polygon is planned Version 1 scope, not current deployed policy availability.

  • Portfolio visibility: Base native ETH and selected registered Base ERC-20 assets.
  • Portfolio examples: USDC, USDT, WETH.
  • Automation eligibility: USDC and USDT only.
  • WETH and unsupported assets are not currently automation eligible.
  • Unknown assets and complete arbitrary ERC-20 wallet enumeration are not claimed.

Maturity labels

Product Status and Evidence

Status labels separate public availability, application operation, internal testing, local-chain validation, Mainnet deployment, Mainnet operation, independent validation, and unsupported future scope.

  • Live means publicly accessible at application level, not Mainnet or Production readiness.
  • Mainnet deployed means a specified contract exists on the stated Mainnet; it does not imply sustained safe operation.
  • Independent audit completed is not claimed in this release.
  • Mainnet operational is not claimed unless separately supported by evidence.

What Praxifi does not do

Product Limitations

Praxifi has explicit Product boundaries that should remain visible in public documentation and user-facing copy.

  • Does not recover, recreate, or custody private keys.
  • Does not prove death, incapacity, identity, lawful heirs, or legal inheritance.
  • Does not guarantee execution, returns, safety, or portfolio improvement.
  • Does not manage investments or automatically execute investment advice in Version 1.
  • Does not support every wallet, token, or network.
  • Does not claim independent validation, independent smart-contract audit, or global legal compliance.

Future capabilities are future scope

Roadmap

The roadmap should help readers understand future direction without presenting future phases as currently available.

  • Phase 1: Public Release and Evidence Maintenance.
  • Phase 2: Mainnet Operational Verification.
  • Phase 3: Refundable Continuity Hardening.
  • Phase 4: Financial Policy Engine.
  • Phase 5: Advanced Portfolio Intelligence and Capital Allocation Research.

PraxiHub relationship

Research Foundations

PraxiHub may inform and challenge Praxifi assumptions, but it is not a regulator, auditor, certification body, legal authority, or automatic independent verifier.

  • Digital Asset Continuity: practical access and intent execution for digital assets.
  • Autonomous Wealth: owner-authorized policies rather than unrestricted automation.
  • Rule-Based Finance: narrow rules with understandable parameters.
  • Resilient Financial Infrastructure: monitoring, evidence, failure handling, and recovery boundaries.
  • Programmable Portfolio Intelligence: diagnostics that explain data without becoming advice.
  • Capital Allocation Research: future research, not current investment-management functionality.

Qualified definitions

Terminology

Documentation terminology should preserve the Whitepaper's qualifications and avoid turning technical labels into legal or financial claims.

  • Owner: wallet user authorizing a policy.
  • Designated Recipient: technical recipient selected by the owner; not automatically a lawful beneficiary.
  • Technical Transaction Executor: infrastructure allowed to submit eligible transactions within contract constraints.
  • Financial Policy: a narrow owner-authorized rule for a defined digital-asset action.
  • Continuous Ownership: continued user authority and activity signaling, not legal proof.
  • Digital Asset Continuity: practical continuity of digital-asset access and intent execution.
  • Basic Inheritance: inactivity-triggered technical transfer policy.
  • Refundable Inheritance: refundable continuity lifecycle with escrow-like contract-controlled state.
  • Check-in: activity confirmation signal.
  • Exact Allowance: approval sized to the required policy amount where supported.
  • Coverage: portion of portfolio evidence available for assessment.
  • Confidence: data-quality signal, not probability of correctness.
  • Production Verification: evidence that a deployed system is operating under defined controls.

Official channel

Contact

Use the official Praxifi email for general contact and security-related reports. This does not imply continuous support coverage or a dedicated security response team.

  • General contact: praxifi.official@gmail.com
  • Security-related reports: praxifi.official@gmail.com

Portfolio Health

Portfolio Healthiness

A transparent analytical score from 0 to 10 that evaluates available supported portfolio evidence on the current Base Mainnet public application path.

What Portfolio Healthiness Is

Portfolio Healthiness evaluates observable portfolio risks using supported on-chain wallet data, verified token identity, market enrichment, security signals, and data-confidence controls. It does not predict returns, provide financial advice, or guarantee safety.

Unsupported, undiscovered, unpriced, stale, or unavailable evidence may reduce coverage and confidence. A high score does not mean losses are impossible, and a missing score does not mean the wallet has no value.

Why These Criteria Were Selected

The individual risk concepts are established in portfolio management, market-risk analysis, and blockchain security. Praxifi combines these concepts into its own explainable 10-point framework.

The framework combines diversification, concentration, liquidity, volatility, drawdown, leverage, issuer risk, smart-contract risk, token-contract risk, approval risk, wallet exposure, and data quality. Category weights and thresholds are Praxifi's product methodology and may be refined as coverage and validation improve.

Criteria and Weights

CriterionWeight
Diversification1.50
Asset Quality1.50
Concentration Risk1.00
Liquidity1.00
Wallet and Asset Security1.50
Stablecoin and Cash Reserve Risk1.00
Smart Contract and Protocol Risk1.00
Market Risk and Volatility0.75
Leverage and Liquidation Risk0.50
Portfolio Management Discipline0.25
Total10.00

Each criterion documents what it measures, why it matters, inputs used, data sources, scoring method, limitations, and educational actions in the dashboard category details.

Data Sources

  • Blockchain RPC is used for wallet balances, token balances, contract reads, allowance verification, and supported on-chain positions. Direct on-chain data is preferred when practical.
  • CoinGecko is used for current prices, market capitalization, volume, historical prices, historical volume, metadata, volatility, drawdown, and liquidity indicators.
  • DefiLlama is used for protocol TVL, historical TVL, categories, fees and revenue where available, and stablecoin metadata. TVL is one contextual indicator and is not proof of protocol safety.
  • GoPlus Security is used for token security signals, malicious address signals, approval risk, dApp security, and contract restrictions.
  • Supported explorers may optionally support transfer data, transaction history, contract metadata, and verification data.

External provider data may be delayed, incomplete, unavailable, or incorrect.

Portfolio Asset Discovery

Status: operational within supported scope. Portfolio diagnostics may display Base native ETH and selected supported or registered Base ERC-20 assets, including currently known examples such as USDC, USDT, and WETH.

Complete arbitrary ERC-20 wallet enumeration is not currently supported or claimed. Portfolio visibility is separate from automation eligibility; automation execution is currently restricted to USDC and USDT.

Calculation Process

Connected wallet → on-chain asset discovery → token identity verification → USD valuation → market and protocol enrichment → security analysis → category scoring → data-confidence calculation → score normalization → findings and remediation actions.

The raw score is the sum of scored framework points. Maximum assessable score is the currently measurable framework weight. Unavailable score is the framework weight that could not be assessed. Normalized score scales assessed points to a 10-point view when at least 6.0 framework points are assessable. If data confidence is below 60%, Healthy and Excellent presentation statuses are gated, but the numeric normalized result is not secretly changed.

Missing and Unsupported Data

Unknown tokens are not silently treated as worthless, and they are not automatically classified as scams. Unsupported protocols are not fully assessed. Native valuation may be unavailable where mapping is not yet supported. Manual behavioral and custody data is not inferred.

Ordinary holdings are not assumed to be unleveraged merely because no adapter detected leverage. A score is withheld when coverage is insufficient.

Limitations

Current limitations include API outages, provider rate limits, indexing delays, metadata errors, rapid market changes, new contracts, unsupported protocols, bridges, cross-chain positions, NFTs, LP tokens, lending positions, leveraged products, private or off-chain assets, smart-contract risks not detected automatically, seed phrase practices, hardware wallet practices, shared-wallet behavior, incomplete approval coverage, and in-memory cache limitations.

How Users Can Improve Each Area

Educational actions may include reviewing single-asset concentration, reviewing chain concentration, reviewing unknown tokens, revoking unnecessary approvals using trusted tools, reviewing stablecoin issuer exposure, reviewing DeFi protocol dependencies, maintaining sufficient liquidity, verifying token contract addresses, avoiding unsupported high-leverage positions, and reviewing protocol upgrade/admin risks.

Praxifi does not recommend buying or selling specific assets and does not provide personalized financial advice.

Methodology Version

Version
1.0.0
Framework ID
praxifi-portfolio-health
Last updated
2026-07-18
Current public path
Base Mainnet
Planned scope
Polygon remains planned scope and is not part of the current deployed policy path.
Providers
Blockchain RPC, CoinGecko, GoPlus Security, DefiLlama, Internal Registry

Portfolio Healthiness is an analytical risk indicator, not financial advice, a guarantee of safety, or a prediction of future returns.

HS-V1 Categories and Weights

Total model weight is 10.00. The model is diagnostic and must be interpreted with coverage and confidence.

HS-V1 categories and weights
CategoryWeightVersion 1 purpose
Diversification1.50Portfolio spread and concentration evidence.
Asset evidence quality1.50How much asset evidence is identified and usable.
Concentration exposure1.00Large single-asset or narrow exposure signals.
Liquidity evidence1.00Available liquidity and market evidence where supported.
Wallet and token security signals1.50Wallet, token, approval, and security-data signals.
Stablecoin and reserve exposure1.00Stablecoin, reserve, and issuer-risk evidence.
Protocol and smart-contract exposure1.00Protocol and contract dependency evidence.
Market volatility and drawdown evidence0.75Historical volatility and drawdown evidence where available.
Leverage and liquidation exposure0.50Leverage, liquidation, or debt-like exposure signals.
Operational policy readiness0.25Readiness of configured policies and operational controls.

Fee Schedule

Gross amount = net recipient amount + service fee. Failed or skipped actions should not create a Praxifi service fee.

Praxifi fee schedule
PolicyFeeCapFee trigger
Scheduled Transfer0.5%USD 3Defined successful billable scheduled transfer execution.
Basic Inheritance0.75%USD 25Defined successful billable inactivity-policy execution.
Refundable Inheritance1.0%USD 49Defined successful billable refundable lifecycle execution.

Contract Register

Canonical deployed contract references for the current Base Mainnet policy path. Polygon deployment is not claimed.

Base Mainnet contract register
ContractAddressNetwork
PraxifiInactivityExecutorV20x29c6efF6D4f2687568e77E6CAA34102C92b07552Base Mainnet / 8453
PraxifiRefundEscrow0x4A0f710cEE41E1987E0f5B6601Bf1Fd229d78b82Base Mainnet / 8453
PraxifiScheduledTransfer0x35874Fd2bF16d0C7D2430BcBAae5D10547F83A56Base Mainnet / 8453

Capability Status Register

Status labels separate live application behavior, internal evidence, Mainnet deployment, and independent validation.

Praxifi capability status register
CapabilityStatusEvidence boundary
Praxifi Web ApplicationLivePublic web application is accessible; this is not independent proof of on-chain Production operation.
MetaMask authenticationOperationalNonce issuance, wallet-signature verification, and protected sessions are implemented.
Base MainnetCurrent public networkCurrent policy path is Base Mainnet, chain ID 8453.
PolygonFuture versionPlanned Version 1 scope only; not current deployed policy path.
Portfolio Asset DiscoveryOperational within supported scopeNative ETH and selected registered Base ERC-20 assets may be visible; arbitrary ERC-20 enumeration is not claimed.
USDCAutomation eligibleSupported for current automation execution.
USDTAutomation eligibleSupported for current automation execution.
WETHPortfolio-visible where registered; automation blockedMay appear in diagnostics, but is not automation eligible.
Portfolio HealthinessOperational; independently unvalidatedHS-V1 is experimental, heuristic, deterministic, versioned, diagnostic, non-advisory, and non-predictive.
Scheduled TransferMainnet deployed on Base; application review availableReal-funds operational execution and independent audit are not independently verified.
Basic InheritanceMainnet deployed on Base; application flow implementedLegal inheritance is not determined by Praxifi.
Check-inImplementedUsed as an activity confirmation signal; inactivity is not death or incapacity proof.
Password-assisted Check-inImplemented with qualificationsAssists activity confirmation; it does not recover keys or prove identity.
Refundable InheritanceImplemented and internally testedContract-controlled escrow-like states require separate risk and legal analysis.
Exact AllowanceImplementedApproval should match required policy amount where supported.
CancellationImplemented where supportedCancellation depends on policy state and authorized controls.
ExecutorImplemented with restrictionsExecutor is technical transaction submission infrastructure, not custody.
Worker/PollerPARTIALSustained Production operation, failover, SLOs, and real-funds runtime remain independently unverified.
Execution HistoryImplementedShows application evidence and lifecycle records where available.
NotificationsImplemented at application levelExternal delivery reliability remains separately qualified.
MonitoringImplemented foundationProduction monitoring evidence remains separate from application availability.
Fee SettlementImplemented and internally testedProduction economic edge cases and sustained real-funds settlement are not independently verified.
Social RecoveryBlocked dependencyNot current Product path.
Private-Key RecoveryNot currently supportedPraxifi does not recover or recreate private keys.
Multi-WalletFuture versionNot current public Product path.
Portfolio AutomationFuture versionVersion 1 does not manage investments or execute investment advice.
Capital Allocation ResearchResearch-stageResearch foundation only, not Product proof.
Native TokenRemoved / not currently supportedNo Praxifi token is required for current fee model.
SubscriptionNot currently supportedCurrent model is execution-fee based, not subscription based.
Payment GatewayNot currently supportedNo separate payment gateway is required for the current model.
Mainnet Real-Funds OperationProduction verification pendingSustained real-funds operation is not independently verified.
Independent Smart-Contract AuditIndependent validation pendingNo independent audit is claimed in this release.

Documentation Coverage Matrix

Whitepaper V1.3 areas are represented in the public Documentation either as complete practical guidance or as an intentional summary with boundaries.

Whitepaper coverage matrix
Whitepaper areaDocumentation locationCoverage
Product ThesisOverview / Research FoundationsFull
Research PillarsResearch FoundationsFull summary
Product ModelOverview / PoliciesFull
Portfolio HealthinessPortfolio / Portfolio HealthinessFull
Scheduled TransferPolicies / Scheduled TransferFull
Basic InheritancePolicies / Basic InheritanceFull
Refundable InheritancePolicies / Refundable InheritanceFull
ArchitectureArchitectureFull
Worker/PollerExecution and OperationsFull with PARTIAL status
SecuritySecurityFull summary
Threat ModelThreat ModelFull category coverage
LegalLegal and Regulatory BoundariesFull summary
EconomicsFees and EconomicsFull
GovernanceProduct Status and Evidence / SecuritySummarized with boundaries
RoadmapRoadmapFull summary
RisksThreat Model / Product LimitationsFull summary
TerminologyTerminologyFull glossary
EvidenceProduct Status and EvidenceFull